Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Sedimentary Research   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Sedimentary Research; September 2001; v. 71; no. 5; p. 713-716; DOI: 10.1306/2DC40962-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D
© 2001 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leclair, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles

Quantitative Interpretation of Sedimentary Structures Formed by River Dunes

Suzanne F. Leclair1 and John S. Bridge2

1 Department of Geological Sciences, Binghamton University, P.O. Box 6000, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, U.S.A.
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Binghamton University, P.O. Box 6000, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, U.S.A.

New experimental data from a range of flumes and rivers have been used to test and develop a theoretical model for the thickness of sets of cross strata formed by the migration of subaqueous dunes. The distribution of dune height can be calculated directly from the distribution of cross-set thickness, and vice versa, independently of aggradation rate. Mean dune height is approximately 2.9 (± 0.7) x mean cross-set thickness. The new models relating dune height to cross-set thickness have been tested successfully with data from flumes and from the Calamus and Mississippi Rivers. Furthermore, it is well known that dune height can be related approximately to formative flow depth. Although prediction of flow depth from cross-set thickness and dune height is imprecise, it provides a useful complement to other methods of estimating flow depth from sedimentary information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S. K. Davidson and C. P. North
Geomorphological Regional Curves for Prediction of Drainage Area and Screening Modern Analogues for Rivers in the Rock Record
Journal of Sedimentary Research, October 1, 2009; 79(10): 773 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
G. H. Sambrook Smith, P. J. Ashworth, J. L. Best, I. A. Lunt, O. Orfeo, and D. R. Parsons
The Sedimentology and Alluvial Architecture of a Large Braid Bar, Rio Parana, Argentina
Journal of Sedimentary Research, August 1, 2009; 79(8): 629 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S. Leleu, A. J. Hartley, and B. P.J. Williams
Large-Scale Alluvial Architecture and Correlation in a Triassic Pebbly Braided River System, Lower Wolfville Formation (Fundy Basin, Nova Scotia, Canada)
Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2009; 79(5): 265 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J. P. Bhattacharya and J. A. MacEachern
Hyperpycnal Rivers and Prodeltaic Shelves in the Cretaceous Seaway of North America
Journal of Sedimentary Research, April 1, 2009; 79(4): 184 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
A. D. Miall
Reconstructing the architecture and sequence stratigraphy of the preserved fluvial record as a tool for reservoir development: A reality check
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2006; 90(7): 989 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. F. Leclair
New pieces to the puzzle of reconstructing sediment paleofluxes from river dune deposits
Geology, May 1, 2006; 34(5): 401 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
M. R. Gibling
Width and Thickness of Fluvial Channel Bodies and Valley Fills in the Geological Record: A Literature Compilation and Classification
Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2006; 76(5): 731 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J. Holbrook, R. W. Scott, and F. E. Oboh-Ikuenobe
Base-Level Buffers and Buttresses: A Model for Upstream Versus Downstream Control on Fluvial Geometry and Architecture Within Sequences
Journal of Sedimentary Research, January 1, 2006; 76(1): 162 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
M. M. Adams and J. P. Bhattacharya
No Change in Fluvial Style Across a Sequence Boundary, Cretaceous Blackhawk and Castlegate Formations of Central Utah, U.S.A.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2005; 75(6): 1038 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
D. J. Jerolmack and D. Mohrig
Frozen dynamics of migrating bedforms
Geology, January 1, 2005; 33(1): 57 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
E. S.J. Dollar
Fluvial geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2004; 28(3): 405 - 450.
[PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Geomorphology: An approach to determining subsurface reservoir dimensions
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2004; 88(8): 1123 - 1147.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology