Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of Sedimentary Research   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 2002; v. 72; no. 2; p. 304-315; DOI: 10.1306/060901720304
© 2002 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehrenberg, S.N.
Right arrow Articles by Nadeau, P.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Research Articles: Stratigraphic Analysis

Postdepositional Sm/Nd Fractionation in Sandstones: Implications for Neodymium-Isotope Stratigraphy

S.N. Ehrenberg1 and P.H. Nadeau2

1 Statoil, N-4035 Stavanger, Norway; sne{at}statoil.com
2 Statoil, N-4035 Stavanger, Norway

Sandstone reservoirs from the Norwegian continental shelf commonly show varying degrees of postdepositional fractionation of Sm/Nd ratio, apparently due to preferential incorporation of Sm in the crystal lattice of diagenetic apatite. Based on data from leaching experiments, an apatite mineral separate, and petrography, it is proposed that fractionation occurred mainly during closed-system burial diagenesis, as phosphate deposited on the sea floor recrystallized to apatite and incorporated rare earth elements (REE) from the surrounding rock matrix. As a result, the Sm-Nd model age parameter in general contains two components of information: A) the true crustal age of the sediment and B) a secondary component of Sm/Nd fractionation, which can be either negligible or dominant. It is difficult to separate these components and thus correct for component B. Even in data showing no obvious signs of postdepositional fractionation, model ages may be variably disturbed by subordinate amounts of diagenetic alteration. However, the isotope ratio 143Nd/144Nd is expected to be relatively resistant to alteration by secondary Sm/Nd fractionation and should therefore be used rather than model age as the principal correlation parameter in stratigraphic studies. In this way, Nd-isotope stratigraphy can still be used as a valuable and unique tool for studies of provenance and correlation, even in strata showing strong Sm/Nd fractionation effects. Strongly Sm/Nd-fractionated horizons (recognized by bulk-rock Sm/Nd ratios > 0.23) may also be useful for stratigraphic correlation, but it is clear that their occurrence reflects special depositional conditions rather than shifts in sediment provenance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Carter and G. L. Foster
Improving constraints on apatite provenance: Nd measurement on fission-track-dated grains
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 324(1): 57 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
B.P. Wade, M. Hand, and K.M. Barovich
Nd isotopic and geochemical constraints on provenance of sedimentary rocks in the eastern Officer Basin, Australia: implications for the duration of the intracratonic Petermann Orogeny
Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2005; 162(3): 513 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology