Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Sedimentary Research

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by James, N. P. Articles by Surlyk, F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Origin of Late Pleistocene Bryozoan Reef Mounds; Great Australian Bight

¹ Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada; james{at}geol.queensu.ca
² Geoscience Australia, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia; present address: Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 20418, U.S.A.
³ Hamburg University, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
⁴ Adelaide University, Adelaide South Australia 5005, Australia
⁵ Christian-Albrechts, University, Kiel D-24118, Germany
⁶ Adelaide University, Adelaide South Australia 5005, Australia
⁷ Japan Marine Science and Technology Center, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan
⁸ University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
⁹ University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Bryozoan-rich biogenic mounds grew periodically on the prograding carbonate slope of the central Great Australian Bight throughout Pliocene-Pleistocene time. Cores from three ODP Leg 182 drill sites provide a record of mound growth during the last 300,000 years over a stratigraphic thickness of 150 m. These mounds, the first such structures described from the modern ocean, grew between paleodepths of 100 and 240 m; we infer that the upper limit of growth was established by swell wave base, and the lower boundary was fixed by an oligotrophic water mass. Detailed chronostratigraphy, based on radiometric and U-series dating, benthic foraminifer stable-isotope stratigraphy, and planktonic foraminifer abundance ratios, confirms that buildups flourished during glacial lowstands (even-numbered marine isotope stages) but were largely moribund during interglacial highstands and are not extant today.

Mound floatstones are compositionally a mixture of in situ bryozoans comprising 96 genera and characterized by fenestrate, flat robust branching, encrusting, nodular-arborescent, and delicate branching growth forms. The packstone matrix comprises autochthonous and allochthonous sand-size bryozoans, benthic and planktonic foraminifers, serpulids, coralline algae, sponge spicules, peloids, and variable glauconite and quartz grains, together with mud-size ostracods, tunicate spicules, bioeroded sponge chips, and coccoliths. Intermound, allochthonous packstone and local grainstone contain similar particles, but they are conspicuously worn, abraded, blackened, and bioeroded.

An integrated model of mound accretion during sea-level lowstands begins with delicate branching bryozoan floatstone that increases in bryozoan abundance and diversity upward over a thickness of 5-10 m, culminating in thin intervals of grainstone characterized by reduced diversity and locally abraded fossils. Mound accumulation was relatively rapid (30-67 cm/ky) and locally punctuated by rudstones and firmgrounds. Intermound highstand deposition was comparatively slow (17-25 cm/ky) and typified by meter-scale, fining-upward packages of packstone and grainstone or burrowed packstone, with local firmgrounds overlain by characteristically abraded particles.

Mound growth during glacial periods is interpreted to have resulted from increased nutrient supply and enhanced primary productivity. Such elevated trophic resources were both regional and local, and thought to be focused in this area by cessation of Leeuwin Current flow, together with northward movement of the subtropical convergence and related dynamic mixing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Rivers, N. P. James, and T. K. Kyser Early Diagenesis of Carbonates on a Cool-Water Carbonate Shelf, Southern Australia Journal of Sedimentary Research, December 1, 2008; 78(12): 784 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bjerager and F. Surlyk Danian Cool-Water Bryozoan Mounds at Stevns Klint, Denmark--A New Class of Non-Cemented Skeletal Mounds Journal of Sedimentary Research, August 1, 2007; 77(8): 634 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Rivers, N. P. James, T. K. Kyser, and Y. Bone Genesis of Palimpsest Cool-Water Carbonate Sediment on the Continental Margin of Southern Australia Journal of Sedimentary Research, June 1, 2007; 77(6): 480 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Braga, J. M. Martin, C. Betzler, and J. Aguirre Models of temperate carbonate deposition in Neogene basins in SE Spain: a synthesis Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 255(1): 121 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Halfar, M. Strasser, B. Riegl, and L. Godinez-Orta Oceanography, sedimentology and acoustic mapping of a bryomol carbonate factory in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 255(1): 197 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Anasts, R. W. Dalrymple, N. P. James, and C. S. Nelson Lithofacies and dynamics of a cool-water carbonate seaway: mid-Tertiary, Te Kuiti Group, New Zealand Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 255(1): 245 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mutti, C. M. John, and A. C. Knoerich Chemostratigraphy in Miocene heterozoan carbonate settings: applications, limitations and perspectives Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 255(1): 307 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. P. James, Y. Bone, and T. K. Kyser Where Has All the Aragonite Gone? Mineralogy of Holocene Neritic Cool-Water Carbonates, Southern Australia Journal of Sedimentary Research, May 1, 2005; 75(3): 454 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]