Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of Sedimentary Research

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Bosence, D. Articles by Waltham, D. GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Dominant Tectonic Signal in High-Frequency, Peritidal Carbonate Cycles? A Regional Analysis of Liassic Platforms from Western Tethys

¹ Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, U.K.; d.bosence{at}es.rhul.ac.uk
² Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, U.K.
³ Departamento de Estratigrafia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
⁴ Departément de Géologie, Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, C.P. 2092, Tunis, Tunisia
⁵ Geological Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
⁶ Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, U.K.
⁷ Departimento Scienze della Terra, Piazza Universita, 06100 Perugia, Italy
⁸ Departément de Géologie, Université Ibn Tofail, BP 133, Kenitra, Morocco
⁹ Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
¹⁰ Departamento de Geología, E.U.P. Linares, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
¹¹ Geologische Staatssammlung, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333, Munich, Germany
¹² Departément de Géologie, Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, C.P. 2092, Tunis, Tunisia
¹³ Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX, U.K.

Meter-scale, peritidal carbonate cycles are a common feature of the geological record but debate continues about what processes lead to their formation. Three conceptual models, or a combination thereof, are commonly invoked to explain cycle formation; eustasy, tectonics, or autocyclicity. These three models are tested with a large new dataset from different Early Jurassic plate margins from western Tethys. Study of seven logged sections from Spain, Italy, Greece, Tunisia, Morocco, and Gibraltar enables an analysis of the possible roles of local versus regional patterns and controls on cyclicity within a Sinemurian time slice. Cycle types are diverse and include shallowing-upward cycles (parasequences) but also deepening-upward and diagenetic cycles (high-frequency sequences) and subtidal cycles. Numbers of cycles per section and cycle stacking patterns within this time slice vary from section to section. Statistical tests (runs tests, time series, and bundling) all indicate random stacking of cycles within sections and an absence of any bundling of thicknesses or of facies trends. Assessment of cycle types by their occurrence and stacking patterns indicates little support for either eustasy or autocyclicity being the dominant cycle-forming mechanism. However, the variability in numbers of cycles per section, thickness variations of the sections, cycle type variability, and randomness of stacking patterns all favor a pulsed, tectonic control for the creation and filling of accommodation space. This conclusion is further supported by evidence that has largely arisen during the course of this study of syndepositional extensional tectonics in the Sinemurian on these rifted Tethyan margins. Although tectonics appears to be the dominant control, superimposed eustasy and/or autocyclic processes cannot be discounted.